Thursday 5 December 2013

The Pain of Arthritis: Can Laser Therapy Help? Part 2

Laser Therapy for the Treatment of Arthritic Knees: A Clinical Case Profile

Fred Kahn MD, FRCS (C), R. Liboro, F.Saraga, phD

"Laser Therapy should be considered as the treatment of choice in the management of pathologies of the knee."


The most common form of arthritis is degenerative osteoarthritis, affecting approximately 80% of the population by the age of 65.  A clinical study of 98 patients presenting with osteoarthritis of the knee at the Meditech Laser Rehabilitation Centre in Toronto, Ontario showed a significant improvement rate in excess of 92%. This article highlights some of the scientific and clinical research studying the effect of Laser Therapy on osteoarthritis.

Abstract

In a follow-up clinical study to our previously published 2006 SPIE conference proceeding, we analyzed a cross-section of patients treated for a variety of knee problems that present at our Meditech Laser Rehabilitation Clinics on a daily basis. Of the 98 patients with knee pathologies included in this study, 63% presented with degenerative osteoarthritis. On average 11 treatments, each 30-45 minutes in duration, were administered to each individual resulting in a significant improvement rate in excess of 92%. Laser Therapy is effective at both the cellular and systemic level, activating a variety of mechanisms including cartilaginous regeneration, DNA synthesis, improved microcirculation and has both an analgesic and anti-inflammatory effect.

1. Introduction

Arthritis results in the deterioration of the joint through the process of chronic inflammation. The most common form is degenerative osteoarthritis. This type of joint disease affects approximately 80% of the population by the age of 65. Osteoarthritis most commonly affects the hands, feet, spine and the large weight bearing joints such as the hips and knees. According to the Center for Disease Control, the lifetime risk of developing osteoarthritis of the knee has been estimated at 46%.

Low Intensity Laser Therapy (LILT), also known as photo-bio-modulation or laser
bio-stimulation, has been used successfully as a therapeutic approach to treat an extensive range of acute and chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Over the past 50 years, LILT research using wavelengths in the red to infrared range (600 - 900 nm) has been applied from in vitro cellular studies to in vivo animal and human studies. In particular, LILT for the treatment of degenerative osteoarthritis of the knees has been a topic of interest both in animal research and human, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials.

A number of animal studies have measured the beneficial effect of LILT on cartilage formation [1], cartilaginous erosion [2], production of superoxide dismutase [2], stress protein levels [3] and chondrocyte proliferation [4]. These studies induce an osteoarthritic state in the knees of rats or rabbits by means of chemical injections into the intra-capsular space. LILT has been found to decelerate the arthritic process [1], regenerate articular cartilage [2], increase the levels of stress proteins, thereby improving the repair of cartilaginous erosion [3] and significantly increase the number of hondrocytes and the thickness of the articular cartilage [4].

Placebo-controlled clinical trials using LILT for the treatment of osteoarthritic knees have also reported the beneficial effects of Laser Therapy. A relatively recent meta-analysis of 36 randomized placebo-controlled trials found that LILT administered within optimal dosage levels, in an intensive 2-4 week treatment regimen, offered clinically relevant pain relief compared to placebo controls [5]. Another more recent clinical trial measured a significant decrease in pain, reduction of knee circumference, pressure sensitivity, extension, flexion and microcirculation as compared to the placebo group which was treated with a sham laser [6].

A recent study has shown that patients with osteoarthritic knees are unlikely to benefit from arthroscopic surgery [7]. Patients who received only conservative treatment (no surgery) did just as well as those who underwent arthroscopic surgery at the two year follow-up assessment [7]. On the other hand, clinical trials have indicated that Laser Therapy for osteoarthritis of the knees alleviates pain to a significant degree, along with the restoration of normal function and overall quality of life. The diagnosis in the majority of these patients was degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee(s) [8]. In addition to the retrospective analysis, we also highlight two case profiles which represent a classical case illustration and an advanced degenerative condition. Medical history, treatment regimen and progress are discussed in detail.

2. Methodology

2.1 Laser Therapy Treatment for Knee Conditions

The BioFlex Laser Therapy system was used on all patients treated (Meditech International Inc., Toronto, Canada). The Figure 2.1 Three position placements for the red and infrared SLD arrays. a) Lateral, b) Medial and c) Popliteal. treatment regimen utilized in this study consisted of a three stage approach [9]. The stages were delivered using the super-luminous diode (SLD) arrays and laser probes as indicated below:

1) Red light (660 nm) using a flexible GaAlAs 180 diode array of SLDs (750 mW)
2) Infrared light (840 nm) using a flexible GaAlAs 180 diode array of SLDs (1500 mW)
3) Infrared laser probe (830 nm) using a single GaAlAs laser source focused on the basic pathology (75 - 200 mW)

In order to treat the entire circumference of the knee, each SLD array was utilized in three positions covering the medial and lateral compartments and the popliteal space (see Figure 2.1). The knee is best treated in a flexed position of 75°. For penetration with the laser probe to the posterior aspect of the patella and the patellar compartment, the knee was flexed to 90°.

In 70% of all patients treated, the protocols utilized were standard and customization was carried out in the additional 30%. Changes in treatment procedure were based on the clinical progress recorded on each individual patient visit. Primary objectives of the treatment were to achieve the following:

•The elimination of pain
•Substantial increase in mobility and range of motion of the joint.
•Cessation of the need for multiple medications (analgesics, NSAIDs and injections of cortisone, synvisc etc.)
•Improvement of the patient's overall status (normal sleep patterns and activity levels)
•To enable the patient to resume normal work and recreational functions


2.2 Retrospective Study

We had previously conducted a clinical study in which we analyzed the conditions and clinical outcomes of 1013 patients treated at the Meditech Laser Rehabilitation Centre [8]. Patients were grouped into one of five categories including degenerative conditions, repetitive stress injuries, trauma, sport injuries or other pathologies. Of the 1013 patients, 98 were treated for knee conditions. We reviewed the results obtained using laser therapy in these patients including type of pathology, age distribution, number of treatments and percent of overall improvement.

2.2 Clinic Case Profiles

Two patients treated at the Meditech Laser Rehabilitation Centre are reviewed. One represents a classic case profile of a patient presenting with Degenerative Osteoarthritis of the knee. This patient required 13 treatment sessions and only 3 alterations to the protocols. The second highlights a chronic case requiring a greater number of treatments comprising 35 sessions and had 12 protocol changes. For each patient, the diagnosis, medical history, physical examination, treatments and progress are described.

3. Results

3.1 Retrospective Study

The results from a group of 98 patients treated for knee conditions consist of 53 males (n=53) and 45 females (n=45). These were analyzed retrospectively. The average age of the patients was 65 years. Sixty-three percent (63%) of these patients fell into the category of Degenerative Osteoarthritis and other diagnoses included synovitis, ligament or soft tissue injuries and Rheumatoid Arthritis. The percentage of patients presenting with varying knee conditions can be seen in Figure 3.1.

The average number of treatments required to resolve the various pathologies ranged from 4 to 11 with an overall average of 8.7 treatments per patient. The percentage of overall improvement was 93.8%. These statistics are noted in Table 3.1.

Examining the 62 patients diagnosed with Degenerative Osteoarthritis, we found that the average age of patients was 64.6 with an age distribution that peaked in the 61-70 age range (see Figure 3.2). The The average number of treatments needed to resolve the pain and inflammation associated with osteoarthritis of the knees was 11.0 and ranged from 2 to 35 treatments depending on the severity of the condition. Sixty percent (60%) of patients required 10 treatments or less to obtain at least an 85% overall improvement with regard to their symptoms and physical status (see Figure 3.3).


3.2 Clinical Case Profiles

The two case profiles highlighted represent a typical case and a more advanced degenerative knee condition that were treated at the Meditech Laser Rehabilitation Centre. For each patient, the diagnosis, medical history, physical examination, treatments and progress are provided.

 

Case Profile 1


DIAGNOSIS: Degenerative Osteoarthritis of the Knees

Medical History:

The patient is a 64-year-old female presenting with a 5-year history of severe bilateral pain of the knees. The patient had been engaged in many sports activities in her youth. Her main complaint was stiffness of the knees, difficulty getting up from the seated position, negotiating stairs and progressive limitation of weight-bearing. She had undergone consultations with a variety of healthcare professionals including the Family Physician, Chiropractor, Massage Therapist and Physiotherapist. She was utilizing Glucosamine and Chondroitin supplements daily. Her X-rays revealed degenerative change of both knees, more severe on the left, with tenderness predominantly over the medial
compartments.

Physical Examination:

Moderate hypertrophy of both knee joints was noted. On palpation, there was tri-compartmental tenderness most pronounced over the medial and patellar compartments. No instability was present. The right knee had a relatively normal range of motion, while there was a 10 degree lack of extension and a 15 degree lack of flexion of the left knee. The patient noted an increase of pain on passive flexion on the left. There was no evidence of instability.

Treatment

Low Intensity Laser Therapy treatments were initiated on alternate days for the first two weeks and subsequently every 3 days over the succeeding 3 weeks for a total of 13 treatments.

Progress

2 treatments - Edema over both knees resolved completely and tenderness minimal on palpation.

5 treatments - 0 tenderness; range of motion returned to normal; only minimal discomfort of the left knee.

9 treatments - 85% overall improvement. The patient was able to stand up from a seated position and walk up a flight of stairs without any symptoms noted.

13 treatments - Asymptomatic, fully functional and total absence of pain.

Case Profile 2


DIAGNOSIS: Advanced Degenerative Osteoarthritis of the Left Knee with Acute Synovitis

Medical History:

The patient is a 75 year old female who presented with an acute exacerbation of chronic left knee pain. She described the pain as if her knee was being "stabbed with a knife", resulting in an inability to walk. She had previous consultations with an Orthopedic Surgeon and a Chiropractor. Several anti-inflammatories and analgesic prescriptions had been utilized. She took these medications over many years but these provided only transient relief. Her most recent X-ray revealed tri-compartmental osteoarthritic degeneration of the left knee and a joint effusion.

Physical Examination:

Marked hypertrophy and edema of the left knee was noted. Lack of
extension was 15 degrees and flexion was to 80 degrees only. Acute tenderness was noted primarily over the medial and to a lesser degree the patellar compartment. The patient demonstrated a mild limp on ambulation.

Treatment:

The patient initially had Low Intensity Laser Therapy treatments on alternating days over 4 weeks. This was gradually reduced to 3 times weekly for one month, then twice a week for an additional month, and finally maintenance therapy weekly for a total of 35 treatments.

Progress

4 TREATMENTS: The range of motion of the patient's left knee improved and lack of extension was reduced to only 12 degrees. She was able to flex her knee beyond 90 degrees. Pain with activity had decreased substantially.

10 TREATMENTS: The range of motion of the left knee continued to improve. The lack of extension was only 5 degrees and flexion was to 115 degrees. The sensation of pain continued to diminish.

14 TREATMENTS: The patient was relatively free of pain and only required the occasional Tylenol.

21 TREATMENTS: No tenderness on palpation. The patient reported that the pain had decreased by 80% and flexion was approaching normal. The patient still experienced some pain on full extension.

24 TREATMENTS - The clinical response to Laser Therapy appeared to have reached a plateau despite adjustment of frequency and duty cycle; the waveform was therefore modified from square to sine wave. Several treatments using sine wave proved to be successful in resolving the plateau and the patient was prescribed weekly sessions for several weeks as part of her maintenance therapy.

35 TREATMENTS - Complete resolution of edema and pain. Progressive increase in overall functional levels of the left knee which allowed the patient to carry out her normal daily activities without restriction and the use of analgesics. The right knee had been fully functional and asymptomatic since treatment session 8.

Conclusions


  • Duration of treatment and correct positioning of the treatment arrays and laser probe are critical in the process of achieving an optimal therapeutic effect.

  • Our experience indicates that the knee is best treated in a relatively flexed position for maximum penetration of the photon stream to the posterior aspect of the patella and the patellar compartment.

  • Customization of protocols including duration, frequency, duty cycle and waveform facilitate the course of healing.

  • In general, protocols are initiated at lower settings which may be increased as clinically indicated.

  • Laser Therapy should be considered as the treatment of choice in the management of pathologies of the knee.
http://www.bioflexlaser.com/arthritis/

For more information, Andrew Subieta and the clinic staff can be reached at Osteoklinika Pain Management & Rehabilitation 905.660.8810.  Also, please check our website www.osteoklinika.com for more information about Bio-Structural Integration™ .  

References

1.Pfander, D., Jorgensen, B., Rohde, E., Bindig, U., Muller, G. and Scheller, "The
influence of laser irradiation of low-power density on an experimental cartilage damage in
rabbit knee-joints: an in vivo investigation considering macroscopic, histological and
immunohistochemical changes," Biomed Tech (Berl) 51(3), 131-138, 2006.
2.Cho, H.J., Lim, S.C., Kim, S.G., Kang, S.S., Choi, S.H., Cho, Y.S. and Bae, C.S.,
"Effect of low-level laser therapy on osteoarthropathy in rabbit," In Vivo 18(5), 585-591,
2004.
3.Lin, Y.S., Huang, M.H., Chai, C.Y. and Yang, R.C., "Effects if helium-neon laser on
stress protein and arthritic histopathology in experimental osteoarthritis," Am. J. Phys.
Med. Rehabil. 83(10), 758-765, 2004.
4.Bayat, M., Ansari, A., and Hekmat, H. "Effects of low-power helium-neon laser
irradiation on 13-week immobilized articular cartilage of rabbits," Indian J. Exp. Biol.
42(9), 866-870, 2004.
5.Bjordal, J.M., Johnson, M.I., Lopes-Martins, R.A., Bogen, B., Chow, R. and Ljunggren,
A.E., "Short-term efficacy of physical interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain. A
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials," BMC
Musculoskelet. Disord. 8, 51-64, 2007.
6.Hegedus, B., Viharos, L., Gervain, M. and Galfi, M., "The effect of low-level laser in
knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial," Photomed.
Laser Surg. 27(4), 577-584, 2009.
7.Kirkley, A., Birmingham, T.B., Litchfield, R.B., Giffin, J.R., Willits, K.R., Wong,
C.J., Feagan, B.G., Donner, A., Griffin, S.H., D'Ascanio, L.M., Pope, J.E. and Fowler,
P.J., "A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee," N.
Engl. J. Med. 359(11), 1097-107, 2008.
8.Kahn, F., "Low intensity laser therapy: the clinical approach," Proc. of SPIE 6140,
61400F-1 - 61400F-11, 2006.
9.Kahn, F., "Low Intensity Laser Therapy", Meditech International Inc. Vol.1-3, 2008.

Wednesday 4 December 2013

The Pain of Arthritis: Can Laser Therapy Help? Part 1

In a recent article written by Dr. J. Mercola, he says:

I recently interviewed Dr. Phil Harrington about the benefits of infrared laser therapy for pain. Laser therapy treatment helps reduce pain and inflammation and enhances tissue healing—both in hard and soft tissues, including muscles, ligaments, and even bones. It increases oxygenation of tissues and allows injured or damaged cells to absorb photons of light, which speeds healing. ...

Examples of the types of painful injuries that this kind of laser therapy can be helpful for include:
  • Acute injuries, such as strains, sprains, and shoulder injuries
  • Repetitive-use injuries such as carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Traumatic injuries, such as post-motor vehicle accident with cervical strain/sprain
  • Chronic issues such as frozen shoulder and arthritis
To me, at this point in time, it would almost be medical negligence bordering on medical malpractice not to try laser treatment before prescribing drugs or surgery for conditions such as these. ..."

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/12/03/acetaminophen-alcohol.aspx


The pain of arthritis holds millions of Canadians back from performing routine daily activities such as walking, enjoying a round of golf, gardening, or even playing with their grandchildren.

Conventional therapies focus on pharmaceuticals which serve to mask symptoms and often have adverse effects. Problems with arthritic medications such as Vioxx, documented in The New England Journal Of Medicine, have led many sufferers to seek safer alternatives.

How Can Laser Therapy Help?


Back in Business: Treating the Degenerating Discs of an Aging Population

 by Dr. Fred Kahn MD, FRCS (C).



Back pain is the primary reason older patients come into chiropractic clinics for help. In an aging population, degenerating discus mean that manipulations available to younger patients are steadily ruled out as time goes by. Laser Therapy can become almost the only alternative that is suitable and safe. In this article, Dr. Guy Pelletier of Brant Chiropractic shares his experience using Laser Therapy on this population group.

Maybe we should have just stayed in the trees. (As a species, that is.) Because complaints of back pain are as old as walking upright. Yet we've never been in a better position to offer relief than we are now. Dr. Guy Pelletier of Brant Chiropractic in Brantford, Ontario agreed to share his experience using the BioFlex system on a specific group: Age 60+ with an existing diagnosis of degenerated discs.

Why did Dr. Pelletier choose this group for controlled observation? Two reasons: Back pain is the primary reason that brings patients into clinics for help. Secondly, in an aging population, degenerating discs mean that manipulations available to younger patients are steadily ruled out as time goes by.

"Live With It - It's Part of Aging"

Older patients living with unrelieved pain report a common and discouraging situation to Dr. Pelletier. They've been repeatedly told, "You'll have to live with it" or "You're getting older and this is part of aging."

A typical patient has localized lumbosacral pain that radiates into posterior thigh, hip, groin, sometimes as far as the foot. Conditions vary from acute, to chronic, many in excess of 20 years.

Dr. Fred Kahn confirms Dr. Pelletier's observations in his paper on Low Intensity Laser Therapy in Clinical Practice." 35% [the largest group] of the patients fall into the category of degenerative osteoarthritis. The majority of these involved the lumbo-sacral spine and over 60% of these were accompanied by degenerative disc disease, bulging discs, nerve root compression, and/or stenosis of the spinal canal." In other words, a major pain in the back and leg.

In treating these patients prior to using BioFlex, Dr. Pelletier found that there was an increased risk of irritating the area after treatment. Patients had difficulty moving around the table, and he had to modify treatments to accommodate this. "Normal" treatments weren't always possible. Pain was also a factor, and that made treatments unpleasant and patients apprehensive. The consequence of these factors was that treatment results were slow and limited.

Enter BioFlex Low Intensity Laser Therapy. Says Dr. Pelletier, "I observed that my patients could first of all sit comfortably, relax, read a book. The treatments didn't elicit any pain--the very pain we were working to alleviate. Instead of working with decreased expectations of results, I noticed satisfactory improvement after three or four treatments, sometimes fewer. Another significant improvement was that I could treat multiple areas at one time.

Conclusion: In older patients, laser can become almost the only alternative that is suitable and safe. Older patients do not have to accept living with pain. Laser is - in non-clinical language the pain-buster alternative. Says Dr. Pelletier about his trial group of age 60+ patients: "We're able to help those who have been suffering and haven't been able to get help anywhere else."

The treatments were effective enough that Dr. Pelletier issued a press release to his local newspaper, resulting in a feature article in the Health section. While this doesn't qualify as hard data, it's impossible to keep patients from talking to friends about the relief they've experienced. Press materials are just the media's version of word-of-mouth. How did Dr. Pelletier incorporate laser treatments into his schedule? With one chiropractic room and two laser rooms, he staggers the treatments 40 minutes apart, and can handle 24 treatments comfortably in a day. Fred Kahn MD, FRCS (C).

At Osteoklinika we use Low Intensity Laser Therapy and rely on the numerous studies through Dr. Fred Kahn, Meditec.  For more information, Andrew Subieta and the clinic staff can be reached at Osteoklinika Pain Management & Rehabilitation 905.660.8810.  Also, please check our website www.osteoklinika.com for more information about Bio-Structural Integration™ .  

Tuesday 3 December 2013

Bio-Structural Integration™ and The 'Boomers'

The baby boomer generation may actually be a misnomer. While it is true that there was a baby boom during the 1950's and 1960's, a more appropriate description would be the active generation. 

Participation in adult sports leagues, entrants in marathons and triathlons have surged, and individuals well into their 80’s are enjoying an active lifestyle. However, with this increase in the active generation, I am seeing more and more complaints of joint disorders, in particular adult knee pain.

During the last 20 years the remedies for knee pain primarily consisted of taking an Advil and icing the knee. Then when the knee become bad enough you would have some form of major orthopedic surgery or maybe a few cortisone shots. However, no one likes to have major surgery and cortisone shots cause long term problems with degradation of the joint.

Here are some painful facts: 

In the U.S. only a few years ago, between 300,000 and 350,000 knee replacement surgeries were being done. Today, that number has risen to a staggering 500,000. And 10 years from now, experts estimate there could be as many as 3.2 million annual knee replacement surgeries. The reason for the increase can be attributed to baby boomers or active generation wanting to maintain an active lifestyle. Previously knee replacement surgeries were reserved for very old patients who were severely crippled by osteoarthritis. But younger patients are experiencing an earlier onset of osteoarthritis that affects their daily lives, usually due to the tearing of their ACL, and sport injuries.

Degenerative arthritis is still the main reason for joint replacement surgery. Degenerative arthritis is a chronic disease that causes the cartilage at the end of the bones to deteriorate, bringing with it pain and a decrease in joint function. Without a means to replace cartilage in knees, total knee replacement remains the only option to regain mobility and end pain. 

Although knee replacement surgery allows patients to do many of their daily activities more easily, surgeons still don’t have a good estimate for how long knee implants will last – especially now since so many patients are getting new knees at a younger age.  It is hopeful the joint replacements will last for more than 20 years, but no statistics are available (because it takes 20 years to get the results!)

Government figures say that by the year 2030, nearly one in five will be 65, and knee and other joint pain will be a particular problem for that age group. It's estimated that nearly half of all adults will develop knee osteoarthritis over their lifetimes, with the obese and those with prior knee injuries at highest risk.

Even if you're at an age when more and more of your friends are developing the problem, research has shown that you can help prevent knee pain by taking the following steps:

Lose weight. In one study, authors found that overweight people with knee osteoarthritis enjoyed decreased disability after losing 5 percent of their weight — just nine pounds if you weigh 180 pounds — over a period of four months.

Exercise more. There is strong evidence supporting land-based exercises, such as strength training or walking, for knee osteoarthritis. According to a recent study, exercise will reduce knee pain and help you move around more easily.  It provides benefits similar to those you will get temporarily from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). 

Part of our Bio-Structural Integration™ is Low Intensity Laser Therapy. It has been the chosen method of treatment for thousands of people suffering from various conditions. This proven and effective treatment eliminates pain, improves tissue repair, reduces inflammation, restores mobility and helps people regain their quality of life.

Laser therapy is the use of monochromatic light emission from low intensity laser diode or an array of high intensity super luminous diodes. It penetrates the tissue without generation of heat. Low Intensity Laser Therapy unlike High Intensity Laser used in surgery or hair removal doesn’t damage the tissue cells. Instead it stimulates healing at the cellular level by increasing biochemical energy that is needed by the cell to regenerate. Treatments take about 30-60 minutes and should be applied two or more times per week. We have had fantastic results with: 

Sports Injuries (sprains, strains, muscles, tendons and ligaments tear)
  • Arthritic conditions (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout etc.)
  • Neuropathic Pain Syndromes (i.e. disc herniation, carpal tunnel syndrome, thoracic outlet syndrome)
  • Repetitive Strain Injuries (rotator cuff tear, tennis and golfer’s elbow
  • Back, neck knee, hip, shoulder pain (i.e. frozen shoulder)
  • Postsurgical wound healing and scar reduction
  • Dermatological conditions (acne, ulcers, psoriasis)
Remember to stay active, keep your weight down, and talk to us about Bio-Structural Integration™. I know we can help you and why would you want to take drugs, have a knee replacement, or cease all activity?  - “It doesn’t have to be this Way….”   Andrew Subieta M.Sc., R.M.T., C.L.T.

For more information, Andrew Subieta and the clinic staff can be reached at Osteoklinika Pain Management & Rehabilitation 905.660.8810.  Also, please check our website www.osteoklinika.com for more information about Bio-Structural Integration™.